Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Leonard v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Walton, K. Jones, Turn Key Health Clinics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Tulsa County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hall and Christopher K Hall
Defendant:
Tulsa County Jail, Summit Food Service and Chaplain Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zerie v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Uqbasilassie K Zerie
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creech v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Bryon K Creech
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
It v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It, Anthony Nkefiah and Anthony Bryant
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herd v. Daniel et al
as 4:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Anne Daniel, K Johnson, C Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Craig Herd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creech v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2019cv00164
Petitioner:
Brian K Creech
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCurley v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00429
Petitioner:
Kenneth K McCurley
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, James Yates and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
