Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
William Manning , Gloria Dean Manning , Ruth Manzer and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porter v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Michelle N Porter
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners and Jacob Owen Streeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00973
Movant:
Jack Russell Owens
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Owen v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 5:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Penny Owen
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Oklahoma Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCaughtry et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Tammy McCaughtry , Linda Pannone , Teresa Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Owens v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Owens
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Houck v. Ball et al
as 5:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
Everett Houck
Defendant:
Harold Ball, Judge Owens and Priscilla Presley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
