Cases 11 - 20 of 2,489
Graham, et al v. United States
as 24-1164
Plaintiff:
RICKY T. GRAHAM and CONNIE L. ARCHULETA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rapid Enterprises, LLC v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-4041
Plaintiff:
RAPID ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, DBA Express One
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Marble, et al
as 24-6047
Petitioner:
JAMES MARBLE, VIVIAN MARBLE and STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. COMMISSIONERS OF THE LAND OFFICE
Respondent:
NS JPF LENDER LLC, JIM PARKER FARMS LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Eliason v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brett L. Eliason
Defendant:
United States of America, The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Kirton McConkie
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
In House Convenience, LLC v. The United States of America
as 1:2023cv00985
Appellant:
In House Convenience, LLC
Appellee:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
