Cases 21 - 30 of 166
API, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8077
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner:
CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Wasatch Transportation v. Forest River
as 21-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASATCH TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
FOREST RIVER, INC., DBA Glaval Bus
Center for Biological, et al v. US Department of the Interior, et al
as 21-4098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS, COLORADO RIVERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH and UTAH BOARD OF WATER RESOURCES
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2021cv00056
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, Bureau of Land Management Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Acting Director and others
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae:
Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Save The Colorado, et al v. United States, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SAVE THE POUDRE: POUDRE WATERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MUNICIPAL SUBDISTRICT, NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COLORADO and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Western Energy Alliance v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Respondent:
United States of America President, United States Acting Secretary of Interior, Scott De La Vega and others
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance, Petroleum Association of Wyoming and State of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae:
Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States v. Walsh
as 20-8074
Defendant / Appellant:
RIVER DEAN WALSH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00234
Intervenor Defendant:
SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, State of Wyoming, MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
