Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gutteridge v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-6321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD JOE GUTTERIDGE, JR., as limited guardian of D.C., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of Oklahoma, CAROLYN FUNK and others
McElroy v. Easter et al
as 6:2015cv01208
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline McElroy
Defendant:
Jeff Easter and Sedgwick County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Diaz et al v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Paul B.R. Diaz and Julia T. Diaz
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Gary King, Bernade P. Struck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter et al v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2013cv00816
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carter
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services , Carolyn Funk , Bethanie Kuzma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Phillips v. Peck et al
as 2:2010cv02313
Plaintiff:
Melissa L. Phillips
Defendant:
Virgil Peck, Jr., Tamara Peck and Bob McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copar Pumice Co., Inc. v. Morris, et al
as 09-2296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COPAR PUMICE CO., INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLAN MORRIS, DAVIS YANTOS, MARY UHL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv04041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Copar Pumice Company Inc. vs. Allan Morris et al.
as 1:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
Copar Pumice Company, Inc. and Copar Pumice Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Allan Morris, Davis Yantos, Ron Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
