Cases 21 - 30 of 20,143
Nevarez v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Saul Nevarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Ben Thomas and Steven J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Armstrong, et al
as 24-4070
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN COX
Defendant:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, ERIC GENTRY, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, K. JAKE GRAFF, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District and others
v. Wade et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Defendant:
Jennifer Wade and Jerid Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Villecco v. Spesshardt
as 24-1259
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, in his official capacity as Director of the Division of Unemployment Insurance, Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Lakey, et al v. Miller, et al
as 24-7055
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LAKEY and DOUGLAS LAKEY, as co-Special Administrators for the Estate of Jared Lakey
Defendant:
TERRY MILLER, in his individual capacity, DAVID DUGGAN, in his individual capacity, JOSHUA TAYLOR and others
Wade v. Millard County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wade
Defendant:
Millard County Sheriff's Department, Jerid Bennett and Millard County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Davison v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Intlekofer v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Intlekofer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villecco v. Barela
as 24-1258
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. BARELA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
