Cases 51 - 60 of 169
Woods v. Rocky Vista University et al
as 1:2020cv01435
Defendant:
Rocky Vista University, Amy (I) Schlueter, Thomas Told and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Medina v. Samuels et al
as 1:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Leto Quarles, Jennifer Samuels, Amy Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gabrielle Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rustgi v. Reams et al
as 1:2020cv00945
Defendant:
Tyler Piscoya, Steve Reams, Kyle Penny and others
Plaintiff:
Tage Rustgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rustgi v. Reams et al
as 1:2020cv00943
Defendant:
Tyler Piscoya, Steve Reams, Kyle Penny and others
Plaintiff:
Tage Rustgi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Dr. Lucas A. Hennings, M.D., Dr. Jonathan P. O'Neil, M.D., The Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
Dr. Lucas A. Hennings, M.D., Dr. Jonathan P. O'Neil, M.D., The Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso and others
Plaintiff:
Don Kevin Woodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fofana v. Santoro et al
as 1:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Ellaine Gallegos, Cory Reitz, Jody Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Fofana
Hill v. Nguyen
as 6:2019cv00434
Plaintiff:
Amy Hill
Defendant:
Andrew Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
