Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eliason v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Veronique Eliason
Defendant:
United States of America, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eliason v. Oaks
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Brett L. Eliason
Defendant:
Dallin H. Oaks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biers v. Dentons US et al
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Biers
Defendant:
Dentons US a Utah Entity doing business as Dentons, Durham, Jones, Pinegar, Zions Bancorporation, Salal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eliason et al v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The et al
as 1:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Kirton McConkie, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The, Dallin H. Oaks and others
Plaintiff:
Brittnie L. Eliason, Veronique Eliason, Kylie M. Eliason and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation et al v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP et al
as 2:2018cv00895
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation Health Department
Defendant:
Steven C. Pulley, Neuma Healthcare Developement, D. Jason Pulley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Shaffer et al v. Interbank FX et al
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Shaffer , Gerald W. Robinson , William Brice Schweitzer and others
Defendant:
Interbank FX and Luis H Rivas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Somerset Properties, et al v. Barnes Bancorporation et al
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Seven Peaks Place , Somerset Properties and College Terrace Place
Defendant:
Curtis H. Harris, Kevin Corless, Barnes Bancorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
