Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rhoads v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff: Phillip Jason Rhoads
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garcia v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff: Phillip Angel Garcia
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00632
Movant: Jan Michel Phillips
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. USA
as 4:2013cv00122
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Lamont Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00351
Movant: Phillip Lamont Jones
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Phillips We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7067
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GWYENNE PHILLIPS
Polk v. USA
as 4:2008cv00258
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Phillip Bradley Polk
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Phillips v. USA
as 6:2008cv00120
Respondent: USA and USA
Petitioner: Gwyenne Phillips
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. USA
as 6:2007cv00393
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Phillip Lamont Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Phillips v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv00525
Movant: Exsavior Antwan Phillips
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?