General Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Dotson v. Chrisman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00311
Petitioner: Kent R. Dotson
Respondent: Jerry Chrisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage v. Addison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00764
Petitioner: Kent G Savage
Respondent: Michael Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Springer v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00655
Petitioner: Lindsey Kent Springer
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bamesberger v. Maketa We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00920
Petitioner: Kent W. Bamesberger
Respondent: Terry Maketa and CDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Proffit v. State of Wyoming, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-8000
Petitioner - Appellant: KENT PROFFIT
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, EDDIE WILSON
Proffit v. State of Wyoming We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-8064
Petitioner - Appellant: KENT PROFFIT
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF WYOMING
Proffit vs State of Wyoming
as 2:2011cv00179
Petitioner: Kent Proffit
Respondent: State of Wyoming and Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lebere v. Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1090
Petitioner - Appellant: KENT ERIC LEBERE
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES ABBOTT, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Proffit v. State of Wyoming
as 2:2010cv00260
Petitioner: Kent Proffit
Defendant: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Work v. Chester
as 5:2010cv03061
Petitioner: Kent C. Work
Respondent: Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?