Cases 31 - 40 of 17,686
Ezell v. Hamilton
as 24-6085
Petitioner:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Respondent:
COREY DUANE HAMILTON and CASEY HAMILTON
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon (PS) v. U.S Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Petitioner:
Larry Gordon
Respondent:
U.S Parole Commission and Eric Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Dillon v. Payne
as 24-3065
Petitioner:
SEAN J. DILLON
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Wilson v. Payne
as 24-3064
Petitioner:
AARON W. WILSON
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Oropeza v. 3rd Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Oscar Oropeza
Defendant:
3rd Judicial District Court and State Of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Golston v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Records Manager and others
Petitioner:
Shane A Golston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
