General Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,823
Tiger v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00317
Petitioner: Sam D Tiger
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winfrey v. Louthan
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner: Ted James Winfrey
Respondent: David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00110
Petitioner: Milton D. Grayson, Jr.
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner: Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodeur v. US Government We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00306
Petitioner: Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent: US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beck v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Petitioner: Patrick Beck
Respondent: FNU LNU, US Marshals and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner: Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner: Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stevens v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner: John E Heavener
Defendant: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?