General Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 17,686
Armstrong v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner: Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent: William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stancil
as 24-1168
Petitioner: NORMAN WILLIAMS
Respondent: ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Johnson v. Harding
as 24-5048
Petitioner: DEXTER LEEMON JOHNSON
Respondent: RANDY HARDING
Santiago v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner: Isaiah E Santiago
Respondent: Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Ricks v. Laughlin
as 24-1162
Petitioner: JOHN ALLEN RICKS
Respondent: SHAWN LAUGHLIN
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner: GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent: M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Puana (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner: Rudolph Puana
Respondent: J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berckmann (PS) v. Executive Director CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner: Jon Berckmann
Respondent: Executive Director CDOC, Colorado Supreme Court, Phillip Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01103
Petitioner: James B.V. Crosby
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner: Nathaniel Williams
Respondent: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?