Cases 81 - 90 of 17,686
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Bell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00694
Petitioner:
Keevin Bell, II
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puana (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
Rudolph Puana
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berckmann (PS) v. Executive Director CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Jon Berckmann
Respondent:
Executive Director CDOC, Colorado Supreme Court, Phillip Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01103
Petitioner:
James B.V. Crosby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Williams
Respondent:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Karn et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Petitioner:
Conrad Czajkowski
Respondent:
Kimberly Karn, Michael Allen, Ainsile Neubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
