Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1036
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, UNITED STATES PORBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO and others
Denney (PS) v. BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Lucas Denney
Respondent:
BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ledbetter v. Thompson et al
as 5:2021cv00197
Respondent:
Lt. Thompson, BOP, FBI and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Steven Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02830
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and others
Petitioner:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. BOP - TOLER HOUSE NEWARK, N.J.
as 5:2020cv00669
Respondent:
BOP - TOLER HOUSE NEWARK, N.J.
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fogle v. Walton-Pratt et al
as 1:2018cv00704
Petitioner:
Jared S. Fogle
Respondent:
Tanya Walton-Pratt, Donald Trump, R. Hudgins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fry v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00509
Petitioner:
James Nathan Fry
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump, Director of the BOP, Warden of FCI Englewood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pate v. Warden of FCI Eng. et al
as 1:2017cv02129
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Eng., Director of BOP, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffin v. DOJ, et al
as 11-3243
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BOP Regional District and CCA OF NEVADA, JOHN DOES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
