Cases 1 - 10 of 34
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan et al v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden and David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Graham v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Kimberly Graham
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Tracy Priddy and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham-El v. Douglas County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv01250
Petitioner:
Jimmie Graham-El
Respondent:
Douglas County Sheriff, Time Computation and Lobby Specialist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham-El v. Executive Director of Colo. et al
as 1:2022cv00560
Petitioner:
Jimmie Graham-El
Respondent:
Executive Director of Colo., Dep't of Corrections, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briscoe v. Meyer
as 22-3054
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHONSO GRAHAM BRISCOE
Respondent / Appellee:
SHANNON MEYER
Graham v. Cooper
as 1:2021cv01982
Petitioner:
Albert Michael Graham
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and Allen Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Graham v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00828
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Oklahoma State of
Petitioner:
Jonathan Scott Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00929
Petitioner:
Steven Glen Craddock, Jonathon Graham, Kenneth Johnson and others
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
