Cases 1 - 10 of 45
DeAtley v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1406
Petitioner:
ALAN DEATLEY, Tribal member, Tribal Sp. Counsel, Tribal Judge
Respondent:
WARDEN FAIRBAIRN, (A.V.C.F.), DIRECTOR WILLIAMS, (CDOC), GOV. POLIS and others
Thomas (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02464
Petitioner:
Kerry Thomas
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and United States Magistrate Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Shakes et al
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Division 4 Judge Shakes, Shakes and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Crow
as 22-3258
Petitioner / Appellant:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent / Appellee:
SAM A. CROW, Judge
Williford v. Ballard et al
as 2:2022cv00856
Petitioner:
Jonathon Williford
Respondent:
Ben Ballard, Judge Van Dyke and Judge Kelli Calicoate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ward v. Rockwell County District Judge Hall 382nd Judicial District of Texas
as 1:2022cv01594
Petitioner:
Nikolaus K. Ward
Respondent:
Rockwell County District Judge Hall 382nd Judicial District of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. Chief Civil Judge
as 1:2021cv02863
Petitioner:
Gabriel Perez
Respondent:
Chief Civil Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pilson v. Canavan
as 5:2021cv00961
Petitioner:
Donald Pilson
Respondent:
Judge FNU Canavan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Callaway v. Rubienstien et al
as 1:2021cv01133
Respondent:
District Judge, Daniel P. Rubienstien, Ashley Attlholm and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jessie Callaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras v. Federal Judge et al
as 1:2020cv02683
Respondent:
Phillip J. Weiser, Federal Judge and Burtlow
Petitioner:
Darren Contreras
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
