Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hazelbower v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03007
Petitioner:
Jameson T. Hazelbower
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins (PS) v. Warden of Teller County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03295
Petitioner:
Benjamin T. Collins
Respondent:
Warden of Teller County Jail and Jason Mikesell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher (PS) v. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv03206
Petitioner:
John Patrick Fletcher
Respondent:
Lewis T. Babcock and Susan . Prose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia (PS) v. Ensey et al
as 1:2023cv02737
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Garcia
Respondent:
Ensey, Polis, Phil J Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Churchwell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02130
Petitioner:
Isiah T. Churchwell and Isaiah T. Churchwell
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Respondent:
Paul Pacheco and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd (PS) v. Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo
as 1:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
Marrin T Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo
Petitioner:
Marvin Tyrone Boyd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
