Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Walters v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Ricco Dontae Walters
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Davis Correctional Facility, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealey v. Hiniger et al
as 6:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez Ealey
Defendant:
Damon T. Hiniger, Core Civic, Inc., Robert Perry, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., James Yates, M. Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Enid Police Department, et al
as 16-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ALLEN HIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ENID POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERTO NORTON, Officer, KEVIN EVERLEY, Officer and others
Clark v. Patton et al
as 6:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Marquis J. Clark
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Damon Hininger, Tim Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Enid Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Audrey Allen Himes
Defendant:
Enid Police Department, Kevin Everly, Cassie Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galindo v. Gentry, et al
as 15-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL B. GALINDO
Defendant - Appellee:
GENTRY, Chief of Security, CCA, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ROBERT PATTON, Corrections Department Director and others
Himes v. Enid Police Department et al
as 5:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Audrey Allen Himes
Defendant:
Enid Police Department, Roberto Norton, Kevin Everley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PATTON, JUSTIN JONES, DEBBIE L. MORTON and others
Brown v. Wilkinson et al
as 6:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Brown
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Laimmer Ray, Tanner Traci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
