Cases 31 - 40 of 15,696
Allen v. Facebook, et al
as 24-3080
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, INSTAGRAM LLC and others
Manning v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Patrick Manning, II
Defendant:
C.O. Jordan and Warden Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Garfield Co Court House et al
as 5:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks
Defendant:
Garfield Co Court House, Tom Newby, Jason Siegars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza-Rojas v. LNU
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jesus Adrian Barraza-Rojas
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Eric P. King
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Nova Crawford
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHAD RANDALL
Defendant:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oren Stacey
Defendant:
William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loveless v. Grady County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Grady County Sheriff's Department, Grady County District Attorney, Grady County District Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Oklahoma Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Terry Morrow
Defendant:
Oklahoma Board of County Commissioners, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Steven Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
