Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cleveland v. Martin, et al
as 14-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN, Warden, MAURICE WARRIOR, Deputy Warden, GLENN WALDON, Unit Manager and others
Campbell v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Oklahoma Board of Corrections Members, Genese McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malipurathu v Ojekale et al
as 4:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dennis Malipurathu
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Carl Bear, Terry Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Martin et al
as 4:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mullin, et al
as 12-7065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISSAC P. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE MULLIN, TERRY MARTIN and EUGENIA SHERRON
Smith v. Martin et al
as 6:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Smith
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Dianna Collins and Dick Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Mullin et al
as 6:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Issac P. Jackson
Defendant:
Mike Mullin, Eugena Sharron and Terry Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Lester et al
as 5:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Terry Martin
Defendant:
Joseph K Lester and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Sherron, et al
as 09-6085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THURMAN HARVEY HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
EUGENIA SHERRON, Law Library Supervisor, JDCC, WILL R. THOMASON, Lt. and Contraband Officer, JDCC, TERESA ALEXANDER, Unit Manager, JDCC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.