Cases 111 - 120 of 126
Hills v. United States
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Hills
Defendant:
No Defendants Named, United States of America, Anthony Osagie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols, et al v. United States, et al
as 09-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. ALLEN
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEYBA, Dr., M.D., HARVEY LAPPIN, John/Jane Doe, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Holz v. United States, et al
as 09-1000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, REBECCA TAMEZ and others
Gometz v. United States, et al
as 08-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KARL GOMETZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARRELL WATTS and others
Fuel v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
Julian J Fuel
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Nahem A Naimey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Holz v. United States, et al
as 08-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, REBECCA TAMEZ and others
Holz v. United States, et al
as 08-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, REBECCA TAMEZ and others
Muhammad v. United States, et al
as 08-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Christopher Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and J. COOPER, FCC Florence Financial Manager
Hall v. Chester et al
as 5:2008cv03235
Plaintiff:
Issac Hall
Defendant:
Claude Chester, (fnu) McKee and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Holz v. United States, et al
as 08-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, REBECCA TAMEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
