Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Hill v. Corizon Health, et al
as 17-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWAME OTOYUMABOYA HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C. GORDON HARROD, Medical Doctor and Physician for Corizon Health Services, Inc., in his individual and official capacity and others
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, SAM CLINE, BERRY LARSON and others
James-Sims v. Mann et al
as 1:2016cv02620
Plaintiff:
Jakova James-Sims
Defendant:
Mann, Palicker, Ison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. CHC/Correctional Healthcare Solutions et al
as 1:2016cv02595
Plaintiff:
Warren D Watson
Defendant:
CHC/Correctional Healthcare Solutions, Mink, (I) Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill (ID 100085) v. Corizon Health Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv03062
Plaintiff:
Kwame Otoyumaboya Hill
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Inc. , Kansas Department of Corrections , C. Gordon Harrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Hollingsworth
as 16-3008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIERRE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSH EVANS, Senior Officer Specialist, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacities
Jeffery (ID 100308) v. Martin et al
as 5:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery
Defendant:
Tammy Martin, Jarred Watson, Rudy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. West, et al
as 14-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ROBLEDO-VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEWEL WEST, TRAVIS TRANI, DALE BURKE and others
Robledo-Valdez v. West et al
as 1:2014cv00818
Plaintiff:
Craig Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Jewel West, Travis Trani, Susan Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batista v. Watson et al
as 5:2013cv03152
Plaintiff:
Raul Batista
Defendant:
Jarred Watson, James Heimgartner and Douglas W. Burris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
