Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Morris v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Morris
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, J. Roemmich and CoreCivic Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris (ID 62300) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03093
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Kansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Davon M. Morris, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bunting et al
as 5:2021cv03078
Defendant:
B. Phralcornklen, (fnu) Coleman, (fnu) Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 5:2019cv01137
Defendant:
Sean McKeehan, Tadasha Morris, Jason Everhart and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Roger's County Jail
as 4:2019cv00410
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
Rogers County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Butler County et al
as 5:2018cv03289
Defendant:
Natasha Ward, Butler County, Dennis Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N.T. v. Guadalupe County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
N.T.
Defendant:
Guadalupe County Correctional Facility , FNU Hatch, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Corizon Health, et al
as 17-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWAME OTOYUMABOYA HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C. GORDON HARROD, Medical Doctor and Physician for Corizon Health Services, Inc., in his individual and official capacity and others
Paige (ID 108422) v. Martell et al
as 5:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Paige
Defendant:
(fnu) Martell, (fnu) Sleed, A. Sirmans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
