Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Luttrell v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2010cv03137
Plaintiff:
Charles Luttrell
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stallings v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2010cv03119
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lamont Stallings
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Marcelle Cappel-Schmidling, Stuart A. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brull v. Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services et al
as 5:2009cv03188
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Brull
Defendant:
Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services, Kansas University Medical Center, Indian Trails Nursing Home and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manco v. John/Jane Does, et al
as 09-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL WAYNE MANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOES (1), employed as Mail Room Employees by the Kansas Department of Corrections S.A.T.P. and Kansas Bureau of Investigations, in their individual and official capacities, S. BUSER, employed as Mail Room Supervisor, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in her individual and official capacity, JJ SMITH, employed as Sergeant of Intelligence Investigation, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
Nichols, et al v. United States, et al
as 09-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. ALLEN
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEYBA, Dr., M.D., HARVEY LAPPIN, John/Jane Doe, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Begaye vs. Farmington Police Dept. et al
as 1:2008cv00653
Plaintiff:
Daryl Donald Begaye
Defendant:
Farmington Police Department, The, San Juan County Board of Commisioners, Eleventh Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmisten v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2008cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Edmisten
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
