Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Copeland v. County of Chautauqua, et al
as 16-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY G. COPELAND, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, ROGER GOSSARD, District Court Judge, Montgomery County District Court, LARRY MARKLE, Montgomery County Attorney and others
Urista (ID 95073) v. Goddard et al
as 5:2016cv03135
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Urista
Defendant:
Johnnie Goddard , (fnu) Klugh, (fnu) Lucht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tivis v. Dowis, et al
as 15-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEITH TIVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY DOWIS, in her individual and official capacity as Health Service Administrator for SCF, NICOLE WILSON, in her individual capacity, DR. PAULA FRANTZ, in her individual and official capacity as Chief Medical Officer for the Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Reed v. Heimgartner, et al
as 14-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOAH REED
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and DEANE DONLEY, RDU Administrator, El Dorado Correctional Facility
Reed v. Con Med, et al
as 13-3191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOAH REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CON MED and STATE OF KANSAS
Reed (ID 72142) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03131
Plaintiff:
Noah Reed
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and Deane Donley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Con Med et al
as 5:2012cv03244
Plaintiff:
Noah Reed
Defendant:
Con Med and Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobar v. Trani et al
as 1:2012cv03052
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Escobar
Defendant:
Trani, Holditch, Huertas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Swingle et al
as 1:2012cv01687
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
Rudy Swingle and Nicholes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Scott
as 1:2012cv01684
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
Bernadette Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
