Cases 81 - 90 of 255
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts , Johnnie Goddard , James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley (ID 87331) v. Craft et al
as 5:2015cv03080
Plaintiff:
Marcus W. Kelley, Jr.
Defendant:
Renda Craft, Richard Dunn, Bill Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salary (ID 96349) v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv03174
Plaintiff:
Mark T.J. Salary
Defendant:
R. Patton, (fnu) Bumguardner, Lorn R. Snedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Foster, et al
as 14-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE WOMACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREN FOSTER, Correctional Counselor, ADX Florence, ELEANOR ALEXANDER, Discipline Hearing Officer, North Central Regional Office, RICHARD ARKO, Senior Officer Specialist, ADX Florence and others
Richards v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2014cv03122
Plaintiff:
Calvin E. Richards, II
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Michael Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waterhouse v. Stewart, et al
as 14-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WATERHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT STEWART, Warden, TRANSPORT OFFICERS and JERRY ROARK, Director, Department of Corrections
Padilla v. Carter, et al
as 14-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA CARTER and CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Terrell-Bey v. Colon et al
as 1:2014cv01042
Plaintiff:
Brooks Terrell-Bey
Defendant:
Juan Colon, G. Hall, Richard Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. TransCor America LLC.
as 1:2014cv01007
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sanchez
Defendant:
TransCor America LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Richard Padilla
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
