Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chiles v. Lemuz et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
FrankieRhea Chiles
Defendant:
Taylor Lemuz, Michael Robinson and Brad Nestel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Bellendir et al
as 5:2023cv03063
Plaintiff:
Clayton J. Martin
Defendant:
Brian Bellendir, Barton County Jail, Doug Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Medical Dept. DOC Freemont Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brad A. McCormick
Defendant:
Medical Dept. DOC Freemont Correctional Facility, Susan Epps, Daniel Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuelling v. Dunsmoor et al
as 1:2017cv01933
Plaintiff:
Kandy Fuelling
Defendant:
Dennis Dunsmoor, Jim Heaston, Mark Clementi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Huff v. O'Neil et al
as 5:2013cv03099
Plaintiff:
Dana Jamal Huff
Defendant:
Christopher O'Neil, Brad Lancaster, Tobi Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Lee, et al
as 12-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LEE, Larned Correctional Mental Health facility and KRISTI OAK, Larned Correctional Mental Health facility
Parrish (ID 25121) v. Lee et al
as 5:2012cv03196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Brad Lee and Kristi Oak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. May et al
as 5:2012cv03044
Plaintiff:
Duncan L. Ellis
Defendant:
Brad May and Bobbie Derks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
