Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jean E Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Clements, et al
as 16-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK CLEMENTS, R. WERHOLZ, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Cary v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 15-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD A. CARY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, CDOC, REA TIMME, Warden, CTCF and others
Gardiner v. Seward County Sheriff et al
as 5:2015cv03110
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Gardiner
Defendant:
Seward County Sheriff, Bill McBryde, Gene Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardiner v. Seward County Jail
as 5:2015cv03112
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Gardiner
Defendant:
Seward County Jail, Bill McBryde, Gene Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Clements et al
as 1:2014cv01024
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Ingram
Defendant:
Frank Clements, R. Werholz, R. Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv00978
Plaintiff:
Ray Nunn
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Tom Clements, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrian v. Harms et al
as 1:2013cv02951
Plaintiff:
Randy Perrian
Defendant:
Allen Harms, Allen (I) Harms, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von Halley v. Bartsch, et al
as 13-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY VON HALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT BARTSCH, Personal Capacity, Civil Action, TOM CLEMENTS and ROGER WERHOLTZ, et al., Civil Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
