Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Malone v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Defendant:
Sheriff Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Undersheriff George Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorantes v. Nye et al
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Dorantes
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Nye, April Beard, FNU Kade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lynn (ID 64377) v. McCurrie et al
as 5:2017cv03041
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Anthony McCurrie, (fnu) Fortier, Derek Sweigart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beauclair v. Dowd, et al
as 14-3036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY E. BEAUCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW J. DOWD, District Court Judge, GWYNNE E. HARRIS-BIRZER, Attorney, WILLIAM K. RORK, Attorney and others
Beauclair (ID 74638) v. Dowd et al
as 5:2013cv03169
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Beauclair
Defendant:
Matthew J. Dowd, Gwynne E. Harris-Birzer, William K. Rork and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Greenamyer et al
as 1:2012cv02283
Plaintiff:
Craig Malone
Defendant:
Derek Greenamyer, Derek (I) Greenamyer, Dana Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03034
Plaintiff:
Robert James Malone
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Johnny Goddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Perez et al
as 5:2012cv03028
Plaintiff:
Robert James Malone
Defendant:
Carolyn Joann Perez and Donald Waddington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Fernando et al
as 5:2012cv03117
Plaintiff:
Robert James Malone
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando and Care Corrections Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Fernando et al
as 5:2012cv03017
Plaintiff:
Robert James Malone
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando and Care Corrections Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
