Cases 91 - 100 of 460
Davis v. Select Employment Services Inc
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Davis
Defendant:
Select Employment Services Inc and Select Specialty Hospital - Oklahoma City, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Shaw v. Grand Lake Mental Health Center, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00143
Defendant:
Grand Lake Mental Health Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kerry Shaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Bass v. Eaton Hydraulics LLC
as 5:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
James Bass
Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Shepherd v. Resonance Center for Women, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R Shepherd
Defendant:
Resonance Center for Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Maestas v. American Furniture Warehouse Co.
as 1:2021cv00850
Defendant:
American Furniture Warehouse Co.
Plaintiff:
Ashley Maestas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Shamblin v. Macy's Logistics, LLC
as 4:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Crystal Shamblin
Defendant:
Macy's Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Driskill v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
as 5:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Leslie Driskill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kopchick v. Vision Bank NA
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Kristiana Kopchick
Defendant:
Vision Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wyse v. AHS Hillcrest Medical Center, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00111
Defendant:
AHS Hillcrest Medical Center, LLC, AHS Hillcrest Healthcare System, LLC and AHS Management Services of Oklahoma, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wyse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Reynolds v. Guardian Security Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shanell Reynolds
Defendant:
Guardian Security Systems, Inc. a domestic corporation doing business as Alert 360 and Guardian Security Systems, Inc. d/b/a Alert 360, a domestic corporation - Alert 360
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
