Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ingram v. United Biosource Corporation
as 23-3270
Plaintiff:
K. K. INGRAM
Defendant:
UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION
Busby v. Lumen Technologies et al
as 6:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K. Busby
Defendant:
Lumen Technologies doing business as United Telephone of Kansas and Christine Bieser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ingram v. United BioSource Corporation
as 2:2022cv02238
Plaintiff:
K K Ingram and K. K. Ingram
Defendant:
United Biosource Corporation and United Biosource Corporation doing business as United Biosource LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rumford v. High Choice Feeders, LLC et al.
as 6:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Rumford and Tyrone L. Rumford
Defendant:
High Choice Feeders, LLC, High Choice Cattle, LLC, High Choice Grain, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suaverdez v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01035
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Suaverdez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Farmer v. Bacone College, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
Beverly Farmer
Defendant:
Bacone College, Inc. , Frank K. Willis and Tammy McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judd v. Access Midstream Partners LP
as 5:2014cv01429
Plaintiff:
Jade K Judd
Defendant:
Access Midstream Partners LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Webster v. Shinseki et al
as 2:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dana W. Webster
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Robin L. Korogi, Albert Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0794 Rehabilitation Act
Miller v. Nordam Group, Inc., The
as 4:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
Sharon K Miller
Defendant:
Nordam Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bagley v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance
as 2:2012cv00761
Plaintiff:
Barbara K. Bagley
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
