Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tung Keng Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CLMBR, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00432
Petitioner:
Tung Keng Enterprise Co., LTD d/b/a DK City Co., Ltd. and Tung Keng Enterprise Co., Ltd. doing business as DK City Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
CLMBR, Inc. and Interactive Strength Inc. doing business as Forme
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0202 - Award Under Convention on Foreign Arbitral Awards
Grease Monkey Franchising, LLC v. GMT, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Grease Monkey Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
GMT, LLC, Jim M Stout doing business as H & S Enterprises, Inc., Paul A Howell doing business as H & S Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Nu Skin Enterprises, et al v. Raab, et al
as 22-4068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation and PHARMANEX, INC., a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
EARNEST RAAB, D.C., DBA Success to Significance, MICHAEL ULRICK, ROSE WIEBER, AKA Test for Nutrition of Washington and others
Nu Skin Enterprises et al v. Raab et al
as 2:2021cv00709
Petitioner:
Nu Skin Enterprises and Pharmanex
Respondent:
Earnest L. Raab D.C. doing business as Success To Significance, Michael Ulrick, Larry C. Wieber individually and doing business as Test For Nutrition of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Nu Skin Enterprises United States et al v. Whittaker et al
as 2:2021cv00604
Petitioner:
Nu Skin Enterprises United States and Nu Skin International, Inc.
Respondent:
William Jonathan Whittaker and Pharmanexmd
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Dish Network LLC v. Antenas Enterprise, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03593
Defendant:
Antenas Enterprise, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0207
Cherry Engineering, Inc. v. Henderson et al
as 1:2013cv01111
Plaintiff:
Cherry Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Larry Henderson and L-Tech Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
