Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 133
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner: State of Wyoming
Respondent: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Consolidated Petitioner: Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Dalton et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff: Zebediah George Dalton, Blueribbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Debra A. Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Petitioner: Navajo Nation, National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0431 Antiquities Act
Garfield County et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Garfield County, Kane County, State of Utah and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Zebediah George Dalton, BlueRibbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Intervenor Defendant: Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and others
Petitioner: National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-601
Petitioner: SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF UTAH and KANE COUNTY
Citizens for a Healthy Community, et al v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 22-1218
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY COMMUNITY, HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES, WILDERNESS WORKSHOP and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Defendant: GUNNISON ENERGY LLC
Sierra Club v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: Sierra Club and Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant: Kent Hoffman, U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Department of the Interior
Petitioner: Emery County Coal Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council et al v. Dallas et al
as 1:2021cv02994
Petitioner: San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council, San Juan Citizens Alliance, The Wilderness Society and others
Respondent: Dan Dallas and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
API, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8077
Petitioner: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner: CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Southern Utah Wilderness, et al v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4073
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, SIERRA CLUB, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and AHMED MOHSEN, in his official capacity as Color Country District Manager
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF UTAH and GARFIELD COUNTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?