Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Albany County Conservancy et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management Field Manager Rawlins Field Office et al
as 2:2023cv00134
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Land Management Field Manager Rawlins Field Office, United States Bureau of Land Management Director, United States Department of Interior Secretary and others
Petitioner:
Albany County Conservancy and J Michael Lockhart
Intervenor:
Rock Creek Wind LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Friends of Animals v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Petitioner:
Rock Springs Grazing Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Director, Deb Haaland and others
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
American Wild Horse Campaign et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management Director et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Land Management Director, United States Department of Interior Secretary, Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Petitioner:
American Wild Horse Campaign, Animal Welfare Institute, Western Watershed Project and others
Intervenor:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Return to Freedom et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Return to Freedom, Front Range Equine Rescue, Meg Frederick and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Tracy Stone-Manning, Kimberlee Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rock Springs Grazing Association v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Respondent:
Bureau of Land Managment Director, United States Department of Interior Secretary, Bureau of Land Management and others
Petitioner:
Rock Springs Grazing Association
Citizens Caring for the Future et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Citizens Caring for the Future, New Mexico Interfaith Power and Light, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the Int Debra Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, Deb Haaland and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico and United States Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-2141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUY CLARK, LINDA CORWIN, CRAIG CORWIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, CAMILLE C. TOUTON, in her official capacity as Deputy Commissioner, United States Bureau of Reclamation, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and others
Garfield County et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Garfield County, Kane County, State of Utah and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Zebediah George Dalton, BlueRibbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and others
Petitioner:
National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
