Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Robinson v. Nationwide Credit Inc
as 5:2021cv00617
Plaintiff:
Demarco Robinson
Defendant:
Nationwide Credit Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Robinson v. 7PN et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Jeffrey Green and 7PN
Plaintiff:
Cari Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-7020
Defendant / Appellee:
SERENA BREWER, Nurse Practitioner - DCF, RHODA SHIVLEY, Nurse, RAY LARIMER, Health Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Konrath et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv01248
Plaintiff:
Samantha Konrath and Marcos Saavedra
Defendant:
Terri A. Robinson, Tracy Renaud, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Austin v. Land Title Guarantee Company, et al
as 21-1154
Defendant / Appellee:
PACIFIC UNION FINANCIAL LLC, VICKIE L. HARVEY, PARAGON MORTGAGE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY C. AUSTIN
Robinson v. Works & Lentz Inc
as 5:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Works & Lentz Inc
Plaintiff:
Demarco Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robinson v. Receivable Management Group Inc
as 5:2021cv00372
Defendant:
Receivable Management Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Demarco Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Crow, et al
as 21-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI QUICK, Chief of Security, MARK KNUTSON, Director Designee ODOC, MR. BENEFIELD, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
