Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Hunter v. GC Services, LP
as 1:2020cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hunter
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dougherty v. St. Johns County Board, et al
as 20-1206
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTER & ASSOCIATES, PA and ST. JOHNS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6055
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
DEBORAH ALLEN, RONALD BAYER, MITCHELL KATZ and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Kemmerly v. Hill, et al
as 20-3028
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ROHR, Sergeant, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, TONY LOSAVIO, Deputy, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, TIMOTHY LINN, Deputy, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL KEMMERLY
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 20-3002
Appellee:
BYRON STONE, PLLC, TEEL & MARONEY, PLC, ABREO & CARTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
WALLER JORGENSON WARZYNSKI, PLLC, WHALEY LAW FIRM, THRASH LAW FIRM, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., SYNGENTA AG and others
Appellant:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, GRAY, RITTER, GRAHAM, P.C. and others
Lipin v. Wisehart Springs, et al
as 20-1007
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLEN E. WISEHART, DEBBIE GRIFFITH, in her official capacity as Delta County Assessor, REBECCA W. GEYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN and JOAN C. LIPIN
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 20-3000
Appellant:
HAGEN & HAGEN, P.C., CHAPMAN LAW LLC, DENNEY & BARRETT, PC and others
Appellee:
TEEL & MARONEY, PLC, ABREO & CARTER, SLAVEN LAW GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 19-3284
Appellee:
BYRON STONE, PLLC, TEEL & MARONEY, PLC, CLINE WILLIAMS WRIGHT JOHNSON & OLDFATHER, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
Appellant:
DEMERATH LAW OFFICE and O'HANLON, DEMERATH & CASTILLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
