Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,104
Michenzie v. Heartland Financial USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01741
Plaintiff: Mary Michenzie
Defendant: Heartland Financial USA, Inc., John K. Schmidt, Bruce K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Harmon v. Biden et al
as 6:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Clark Harmon
Defendant: Joe Biden, Merrick B. Garland, Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jing v. Garland
as 24-9540
Petitioner: SHUANGFA JING
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
NAJAFBEYGI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2024cv00559
Plaintiff: MILAD NAJAFBEYGI
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
USSEC v. Reven Holdings, Inc., et al
as 24-1235
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: REVEN HOLDINGS, INC., DBA Reven Pharmaceuticals, REVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BRIAN D. DENOMME and others
Intervenor: LEAH SCHAAT and LEE ANN FROST
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. Haff Poultry, et al
as 24-602
Petitioner: PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
Respondent: HAFF POULTRY, INC., NANCY BUTLER, JOHNNY UPCHURCH and others
Sullivan v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2024cv02214
Plaintiff: Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant: Steve Sullivan, Herbert McCowen, Diana Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sifuentes Matallana v. Garland
as 24-9536
Petitioner: JULIO SIFUENTES MATALLANA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?