Cases 1 - 10 of 25
In re: Vue
as 23-6019
Petitioner:
In re: ONG VUE
Respondent / Appellee:
JANET DOWLING, Warden, Dick Conner Correctional Center
United States v. Polk
as 22-5037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CONNER LEE POLK
United States v. Littlejohn-Conner
as 21-1224
Defendant / Appellant:
RHYAN LITTLEJOHN-CONNER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clervrain v. Sessions, et al
as 21-3039
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA MELLENDICK, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JEB CHARLES JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Masciotra v. Vertafore, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03603
Plaintiff:
Conner Masciotra
Defendant:
Vertafore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Hafen v. McGrath et al
as 2:2020cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Marilyn McGrath, Conner McGrath and Mark McGrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Hudgins et al
as 4:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Chad Hudgins, Angela McNeill, Victoria Rylant and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lopez v. The City of Belen, et al
as 20-2104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA LOPEZ, as the personal representative of the estate of Luis Lopez, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CONNER, LEONA VIGIL, in their individual and official capacities and THE CITY OF BELEN
Stallings v. SemGroup Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv03108
Defendant:
Sarah M. Barpoulis, SemGroup Corporation, Ronald A. Ballschmiede and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Stallings
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gobert v. Newton-Embry, et al
as 19-6159
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA GUESS, Records Officer, Dick Conner Correctional Center, KRISTIN TIMS, Manager of Sentence Administration, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, JANET DOWLING, Warden, Dick Conner Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVIS JOHN GOBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
