Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Farhat, et al v. United States
as 21-7061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA ANN FARHAT, as personal representative of the estate of William Edward Farhat, Jr., deceased, KIMBERLY DIANE PAGE, as personal representative of the estate of Kristy Farhat, deceased, KAYLEE WALDEN, as personal representative of the estate of Physher Wyatt Farhat, deceased, and as guardian of Weston Buck Farhat and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Terracon Consultants Inc v. Insight Group LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv02444
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mr. Robert Pavlicek and T T Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
Kylie Page, Jason Hatch, Bryan Shiver and others
Plaintiff:
Terracon Consultants Inc
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Insight Group LLC and William Christopher, Jr
Birch v. City of Atchison, Kansas, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-3117
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM BUSH, MICHAEL WILSON, MATT STOUT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE W. BIRCH
Dorfman v. MGP Ingredients, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv02239
Defendant:
Augustus C. Griffin, Terrence P. Dunn, James L. Bareuther and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dorfman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sayed v. Virginia, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-1138
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HRADECKY, Sterling Correctional Facility, CAPTAIN MICHAEL TIDWELL, Sterling Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE, 2, C/O Sterling Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAZHAR A. SAYED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Page v. Commandant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-3005
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMANDANT, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFERY T. PAGE
Sullivan v. University of Kansas Hospital, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-3213
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN BROWN, BOB PAGE, TIFFANY WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Dease v. Allbaugh, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-6068
Defendant:
WARDEN BRAGGS, individually and in his official capacity at Reception and Assessment Center COA and DEPUTY WARDEN WHITTON, in his individual capacity at Reception and Assessment Center DOC and in his official capacity at Reception and Assessment Center DOC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM PRESTON, in his individual capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp Correctional Center and in his official capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp Correctional Center, ALLISON GIBSON, in her individual official capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp CorrectionalCenter and in her official capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp Correctional Center, AMANDA WEBB, in her individual capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp Correctional Center and in her official capacity, Unit Manager in Unit J at Joseph Harp Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY DEASE
Penk v. Honorable Governor of CO
as 19-1073
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAGE PENK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.