Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States v. Moon Seals
as 24-1028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MALACHI MATHIAS MOON SEALS
Seale v. Peacock
as 1:2022cv02381
Plaintiff:
Bryan Seale
Defendant:
Gary Peacock
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701 Unlawful Access To Stored Communications
Seale v. Peacock
as 1:2022cv02382
Plaintiff:
Bryan Seale
Defendant:
Gary Peacock
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701 Unlawful Access To Stored Communications
Seals v. State of Oklahoma
as 21-6140
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS BERNARD SEALS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Seale v. Peacock
as 21-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY PEACOCK, an individual; and John Doe and/or Jane Doe, individuals whose true name(s) are unknown
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN SEALE, an individual
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Seale v. QEP Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00303
Defendant:
QEP Resources, Inc., Michael J. Minarovic, Barth E. Whitham and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Seale
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Seals v. Smith
as 20-6110
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS BERNARD SEALS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. SMITH
Scott v. King, et al
as 15-1343
Appellant:
FRANCES MOORER SCOTT
Appellee:
DENNIS W. KING, Chapter 7 Trustee, BETTY QUINN MOORER, SEALE E. MOORER, JR. and others
Debtor - Debtor:
GALEN LEMAR AMERSON, officer, director, shareholder BOS, Inc., member See the Signs, LLC and FRANCES MOORER SCOTT, officer, director, shareholder BOS, Inc., member Experimental Learning Tools, LLC, member TWP, LLC, former member See the Signs, LLC, member Clear & Free, LLC, member GAPPE, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
