Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rineheart v. Doyle et al
as 6:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
William Rineheart and William E. Rineheart
Defendant:
Nicole LaVonne Vernon Doyle and Mary Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simmons et al v. Ganley et al
as 6:2021cv01130
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Simmons and Catherine Simmons
Defendant:
Darnell B. Ganley, Elizabeth A. Doyle and Joshua A. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreno et al v. Zimmerman
as 2:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jeanie R Moreno and Vincent S Moreno
Defendant:
MD Edward Doyle Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suppes v. Gordon
as 4:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Doyle Gordon
Plaintiff:
Charlene Suppes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen et al v. Blue Bird et al
as 2:2018cv00470
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries, Borg Warner Borse Tec, Blue Bird and others
Cross Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Dana Companies, Honeywell International and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Labrum, Doyle Labrum, Carolyn Dutson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Gibson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01294
Plaintiff:
Berniece Robinson, Samuel James, Jr., Jacqueline Middleton and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Doyle v. Barnum et al
as 6:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle
Defendant:
Madison Barnum, Weatherly Truck Lines, Inc. and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunagan v. Kido
as 2:2018cv02090
Plaintiff:
Doyle D. Dunagan, Sr.
Defendant:
Takaaki Kido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunagan v. Kido
as 2:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
Doyle D. Dunagan, Sr.
Defendant:
Takaaki Kido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendrickson v. Doyle
as 1:2014cv02013
Defendant:
Thomas Doyle
Plaintiff:
C. Vance Hendrickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
