Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Woods et al v. Dixie State University et al
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Nanea Woods and Austen Harris
Defendant:
Dixie State University , Jason Boothe and Catherria Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coker et al v. Shawnee City of et al
as 5:2010cv01235
Plaintiff:
James S Coker , Brian LeGrand` , Justin K Atkins and others
Defendant:
Shawnee City of, Brian McDougal, Shawnee Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jacobs et al v. Milner et al
as 6:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jacobs, Aaron Jacobs, Brock Webster and others
Defendant:
Ben Milner, Ben Milner, Mark Cathey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gallant et al v. Booth et al
as 6:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gallant, Aaron Jacobs, Brock Webster and others
Defendant:
Ben Milner, Ben Milner, Mark Cathey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
