Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02055
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Meek v. Vokal, et al
as 11-8045
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK E. MEEK, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH VOKAL, an individual, LAWRENCE COMPTON, an individual, TODD SMITH, an individual and others
Golf Works, Inc. v. Philippou et al
as 1:2009cv00872
Plaintiff: Golf Works, Inc.
Defendant: Philippos Philippou, Katerina, Inc., Katerina, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Golf Works, Inc. v. Philippou et al
as 1:2009cv00873
Plaintiff: Golf Works, Inc.
Defendant: Philippos Philippou, Katerina, Inc., Katerina, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Fennell v. Gregory et al
as 1:2009cv00019
Plaintiff: Randall T. Fennell
Defendant: Matthew T. Gregory, Gregory Baka, Anthony Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogumoro v. Wabol et al
as 1:2008cv00010
Plaintiff: Aniceto T. Ogumoro
Defendant: Juan I. Wabol, Edward Manalili, James Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Witteman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv04128
Plaintiff: George Milam Hall
Defendant: Douglas P. Witteman, Douglas P. Witteman, Phillip M Fromme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Becker v. Kroll, et al
as 05-4096
Plaintiff - Appellee: TAJ BECKER, MD - Doctor of Medicine
Defendant - Appellant: J. DENNIS KROLL, JEFF WRIGHT, TERRY ALLEN, PhD - Doctor of Philosophy and others
Defendant: GALE R. EVANS, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, DAVID GARDNER and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?