Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Parga et al v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Parga , Richard Feltz , Tara O'Donley and others
Defendant:
Tulsa County, Vic Regalado , Terry H Bitting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cramer et al v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Angela Cramer , Aimee Drake , Donella Epps and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners and David Hooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copeland et al v. C.A.A.I.R. et al
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Arthur Copeland , Brandon Spurgin , Brad McGahey and others
Defendant:
C.A.A.I.R., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Pet Food, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Owens v. Child Support Office of Fort Smith Arkansas et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens, Sr
Defendant:
Child Support Office of Fort Smith Arkansas and Anita Elaine Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. All State Insurance et al
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
All State Insurance and Mike Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Osage Casino
as 4:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
Osage Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. David L Moss Criminal Justice Center
as 4:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
David L Moss Criminal Justice Center, Mail Clerk Martinez and Ms Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Mr Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
