Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Whitley v. Texas Office of Attorney General et al
as 6:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Monica Danielle Morris, Peter N. Susca and Texas Office of Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J R et al v. Norman Public Schools et al
as 5:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
J R and D B
Defendant:
Norman Public Schools , Russell Caldwell, Kevin Reamey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grizzle v. Christian et al
as 6:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kim Grizzle and Twila Grizzle
Defendant:
John Christian , Pontotoc County Board of County Commissioners , Arnold Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trimble v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tom D Trimble
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma , Karen Keith and Ron Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Griffith v. Caney Valley Public Schools et al
as 4:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
Hayden Griffith
Defendant:
Caney Valley Public Schools , Rick Peters , Clint Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates v. Board of County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2013cv00805
Plaintiff:
Patsy Marie Bates
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Mayes County , Aaron Peters and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Peters v. Jenks et al
as 4:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Windsome Peters
Defendant:
Terry Jenks and Richard Dugger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
