Cases 21 - 30 of 483
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag - Fed. Question - Employment Discrimination (Age)
Martin, et al v. Office of Personnel
as 23-1230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
O'Flaherty et al v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Neal Patrick O'Flaherty and Dylan O'Flaherty
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service, New Mexico State Police, Torrance County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Glynda Holcomb
Defendant:
City of Denver Police Department, City and County of Denver Public Defender, Yum!, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FoFana v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Linda J. FoFana
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Department of Transportation, The, Department of Housing, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, BRITTEN LUND, KIM DIMOND-SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
