Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Fox v. California Franchise Tax Board, et al
as 11-1037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, a California State Agency, JOHN CHIANG, Chairman-California Franchise Tax Board, individually and in his official capacity, RICK WARD, individually and in his official capacity and others
Frischenmeyer v. Werholtz et al
as 6:2010cv01430
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Frischenmeyer
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz , Robert Hinshaw , Unknown Eighteenth Judicial District Court Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huerta v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County et al
as 1:2010cv00428
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Grant County and Grant County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Rudy Huerta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Neem Karoli Baba Ashram, Inc. v. Town of Taos et al
as 6:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
Neem Karoli Baba Ashram, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Taos, Rudy Abeyta, Amy Quintana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Briggs
as 09-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL W. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUDY BRIGGS, Sheriff
Trujillo v. Town of Taos, et al
as 1:2008cv00661
Plaintiff:
Patricia V. Trujillo
Defendant:
Town of Taos, Abigale Adame, Darren Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nall v. Hale et al
as 5:2008cv00631
Plaintiff:
Edwin Powell Nall
Defendant:
Stuart A Hale, Malerie C Turner Albertson, Elizabeth Hale Tank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
