Cases 31 - 40 of 1,805
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vaughn v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
JEANETTA VAUGHN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., a corporation, DBA Chase Bank and TRINA PELECH, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Williams v. Cache County, et al
as 24-4015
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, an individual
Defendant:
CACHE COUNTY, a public politic, D. CHAD JENSEN, individually and in his official capacity as Cache County Sheriff, LOWER FOODS, a Utah corporation and others
Medina v. United States Department of Treasury, et al
as 24-8000
Plaintiff:
VANESSA MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Bruner v. Cassidy, et al
as 23-6216
Plaintiff:
LAQUITA BRUNER, as Administrator of the Estate of Dawawn Q. McCoy
Defendant:
OFFICER KELLY CASSIDY, an individual, OFFICER BRANDON LEE, an individual, OFFICER ROBIN RIDNER, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
