Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-6249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lee v. Medrano et al
as 6:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Lee
Defendant:
Eduardo Medrano and John Blansett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lee v. Medrano et al
as 1:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Lee
Defendant:
Eduardo Medrano and John Blansett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lundy v. Zacharias et al
as 4:2007cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lundy
Defendant:
C Michael Zacharias, Joseph H Casey, Mark Barcus and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fisher, et al vs. City of Las Cruces, et al
as 2:2007cv00421
Plaintiff:
Robert Fisher and Mary Fisher
Defendant:
The City of Las Cruces, Joann Christine Schnell, Roberto Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fisher, et al vs. City of Las Cruces, et al
as 1:2007cv00421
Plaintiff:
Robert Fisher and Mary Fisher
Defendant:
The City of Las Cruces, Joann Christine Schnell, Roberto Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burbank v. USDC UT, et al
as 2:2004cv00742
Plaintiff:
James W. Burbank
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Counter_defendant:
Martin Terry Campbell, Dwight Hughes, Curtis Richmond and others
Counter_claimant:
Uintah County , Uintah County Attorney , Uintah County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.